In a significant administrative move, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has relieved Ravinder Singh Jamwal of his additional charge as Director of Operations, overseeing the Flight Standards Directorate (FSD). The decision comes weeks after IndiGo, India’s largest airline by market share, faced an operational crisis that left over 5,000 flights canceled and tens of thousands of passengers stranded across the country. While Jamwal will continue to hold his primary role as Director of Airspace and Air Navigation Services (ANS), his removal from the FSD comes amid multiple ongoing investigations into the airline’s crisis.

Role of FSD and Jamwal’s Responsibilities

The Flight Standards Directorate plays a crucial role in regulating pilot operations and ensuring adherence to safety standards, including the enforcement of crew duty and rest rules. As the officer holding additional charge of FSD, Jamwal had oversight over the application of these rules, approval of airline crew duty schedules, and overall monitoring of operational compliance.

During the IndiGo crisis, Jamwal’s responsibilities were central. Eleven senior DGCA officials were deployed to major airports to monitor IndiGo’s operations round-the-clock, submitting detailed reports directly to him. The oversight included reviewing flight schedules, crew rosters, and compliance with the recently tightened crew fatigue rules that had come into effect on November 1, 2025.

IndiGo’s Operational Crisis

The crisis began in early December when IndiGo admitted to “misjudgment and planning gaps” in implementing stricter crew fatigue regulations, despite having two years to prepare. These regulations were designed to limit pilot duty hours during night operations and mandate weekly rest periods, ensuring pilots are adequately rested to maintain flight safety.

On December 6, the DGCA granted IndiGo sweeping exemptions from these rules, including:

1. Extended duty hours for pilots during night operations.
2. Relaxation of mandatory weekly rest requirements, allowing airlines to substitute other leave for mandatory rest.

These exemptions, while intended to help the airline manage flight schedules during the regulatory transition, drew immediate criticism from pilot associations and safety experts. They warned that the accommodations “gravely compromised the safety of the flying public,” citing concerns that fatigued pilots could increase the risk of errors during flights.

Despite these regulatory relaxations, the airline’s operations continued to be chaotic. Over 5,000 flights were canceled in the span of days, leaving tens of thousands of passengers stranded and disrupting domestic air travel nationwide. Airports across India reported overcrowded lounges, delayed flights, and mounting passenger complaints.

Administrative Action: Jamwal’s Reassignment

On December 23, the DGCA issued an official order reassigning Jamwal to his original portfolio as Director of Airspace and ANS. The order stated:

“Ravinder Singh Jamwal, director of operations, holding additional charge of Flight Standards Directorate along with existing charge of Airspace and Air Navigation Services Standards, has been posted to Airspace and ANS at the headquarters until further orders.”

The directive did not provide a reason for the reassignment, leaving room for speculation about whether it was connected to the IndiGo crisis or broader administrative restructuring.

The timing of the order is noteworthy. It came a day after a four-member DGCA inquiry committee, headed by Joint Director General Sanjay K. Bramhane, submitted its confidential report on the IndiGo operational meltdown. The report’s findings have not been made public, but the reassignment of Jamwal immediately following its submission suggests a possible link.

Concerns About Regulatory Oversight

The IndiGo crisis and subsequent DGCA actions have sparked a wider debate about the balance between operational flexibility for airlines and passenger safety. The exemptions granted to IndiGo highlighted a potential gap in regulatory enforcement, especially during periods of transition when airlines adjust to new safety protocols.

Pilot associations have argued that such exemptions should be granted only under stringent supervision and with clear accountability mechanisms to ensure that safety standards are not compromised. The role of DGCA officials, including those in FSD, is critical in enforcing these standards and safeguarding passengers. Any perceived lapse can trigger administrative scrutiny, as seen in Jamwal’s reassignment.

Implications for DGCA and Airline Safety

The reassignment of a senior officer like Jamwal underscores the DGCA’s heightened focus on accountability in the wake of high-profile operational disruptions. The incident has placed a spotlight on the need for robust monitoring frameworks, especially when exemptions to safety rules are issued.

Experts note that the operational meltdown at IndiGo could serve as a case study for the aviation sector, highlighting the importance of:

• Proactive planning for regulatory changes: Airlines must align operational capacities with new safety regulations well in advance.
• Stringent oversight by regulators: DGCA officials must ensure compliance with fatigue management rules, particularly during periods of regulatory transition.
• Transparent communication: Timely and clear communication with pilots, staff, and passengers is critical to managing disruptions effectively.

While Jamwal retains his role in Airspace and ANS, which deals with air traffic management and navigation services, the removal from FSD suggests a narrowing of operational oversight responsibilities during ongoing investigations. It also signals the DGCA’s intention to reinforce accountability within its ranks following a crisis that significantly impacted passengers and operations nationwide.

Looking Ahead

As multiple investigations into IndiGo’s operational failures continue, the DGCA is expected to review internal protocols and oversight mechanisms. This may include reassessing exemption policies, pilot duty approvals, and internal monitoring practices within the FSD.

For the aviation industry, the crisis serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between operational efficiency and safety compliance. Ensuring that pilots are adequately rested and that duty hour limits are strictly enforced remains central to maintaining safety standards, particularly in India’s rapidly growing aviation market.

The reassignment of Jamwal, while not explicitly linked to culpability, reflects the seriousness with which the DGCA is treating administrative accountability. The confidential committee report may provide further clarity on operational lapses, regulatory gaps, and steps required to prevent future disruptions.

Conclusion

The DGCA’s decision to relieve Ravinder Singh Jamwal of his additional charge as Director of Operations, Flight Standards Directorate, comes in the wake of one of India’s most disruptive airline operational crises. The episode has highlighted systemic challenges in regulatory oversight, airline preparedness, and pilot fatigue management.

As IndiGo continues to restore normalcy and regulators conduct investigations, the aviation sector faces renewed scrutiny over operational safety, compliance with crew duty rules, and the effectiveness of internal monitoring frameworks. For passengers and industry observers, the episode underscores the critical role of regulatory vigilance and accountability in ensuring safe and reliable air travel in India.

---