Tennis Australia (TA) and the Professional Tennis Players’ Association (PTPA) are reportedly close to reaching a settlement in the ongoing legal dispute that has embroiled multiple governing bodies in professional tennis. The development could resolve some of the sport’s most high-profile disputes just ahead of the 2026 Australian Open, scheduled to begin on 12 January.

The PTPA, co-founded in 2020 by Novak Djokovic to increase player influence over the sport, filed a lawsuit earlier this year against the ATP and WTA Tours, claiming “anti-competitive practices and a blatant disregard for player welfare.” In September, the lawsuit was expanded to include the four Grand Slam tournaments, heightening its significance.

---

Settlement Talks with Tennis Australia Underway

A recent letter filed with the United States Southern District Court in New York confirms that PTPA and Tennis Australia are engaged in “substantive and productive bilateral settlement discussions.” The filing requests Judge Margaret Garnett to stay proceedings against Tennis Australia while a legal agreement is finalized.

Crucially, this request does not apply to the other defendants, including the ATP Tour, WTA Tour, and the organisers of the French Open, Wimbledon, and the US Open.

While details of the potential settlement remain under wraps, reaching an agreement with Tennis Australia could strengthen the PTPA’s negotiating position with other Grand Slam organisers and help reform player welfare, scheduling, and prize money structures.

---

The Scope of the PTPA Lawsuit

The 163-page lawsuit lodged in New York in March targets what the PTPA describes as the monopolistic control of the men’s and women’s tours. Key points of contention include:

• Alleged cartel-like agreements capping prize money.
• Restrictions preventing potential competitors from entering the market.
• The “unsustainable” tour schedule.
• The current ranking system and its impact on players’ careers.

Executive Director Ahmad Nassar explained the PTPA’s approach to BBC Sport in March:

“The goal is not to litigate this to the end. We are prepared if necessary, but what we actually want is to get everybody to the table to reform the sport the way that many of them have already spoken about.”

---

Other Legal and Regulatory Challenges

The New York case may ultimately proceed to a jury trial if settlements are not reached. In parallel, the PTPA has lodged complaints with the European Commission and the UK Competition and Markets Authority, reflecting the global scope of the dispute.

The ATP and WTA have consistently rejected the claims. In March, the ATP described the lawsuit as “entirely without merit,” while the WTA called it a “baseless legal case” that could divert attention from the sport’s core priorities.

The International Tennis Federation (ITF) and the International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) were initially named in the suit but were removed as defendants in September.

---

What This Means Ahead of the Australian Open

A settlement between Tennis Australia and the PTPA could pave the way for a smoother 2026 Australian Open, allowing top players to participate without lingering legal uncertainties. Whether the agreement will include concrete commitments on prize money increases, schedule reforms, or player welfare initiatives has not been disclosed.

For the PTPA, a settlement with one Grand Slam organiser could set a precedent for negotiations with the French Open, Wimbledon, and the US Open, potentially reshaping the governance of professional tennis and amplifying player voices worldwide.