The abrupt dismissal of Andriy Yermak — long considered President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s most powerful adviser — has sent shockwaves through Ukraine’s political system at a time of intense military pressure from Russia and rising public frustration at home.
For years, Yermak stood beside Zelenskyy both physically and politically. A towering figure with a tough reputation, the former film-industry lawyer evolved into one of the most influential power brokers in Kyiv. Inside government circles, his authority was so vast that many described him as Ukraine’s “second president” — a strategist who shaped negotiations, appointments, and military decisions far beyond the traditional role of a chief of staff.
Now, amid a corruption scandal, Western unease, and internal backlash, his fall marks one of the most dramatic political shifts inside Ukraine since the beginning of the full-scale invasion.
A Powerbroker Brought Down by Scandal and Pressure
Yermak’s exit came after months of mounting allegations tied to a sprawling corruption investigation reportedly linked to state-controlled energy assets. Western partners had quietly expressed concern about his role, while Ukrainian media reported that he remained defiant even as investigators searched his residence.
Although Zelenskyy publicly described the move as a “resignation,” multiple political insiders say the dismissal was forced — and that even allies appointed by Yermak eventually supported the decision. His removal came after what local reports described as a tense confrontation and a wave of political consensus that Kyiv needed a reset.
Yermak later released a brief message insisting on his innocence and claiming he was prepared to join the front lines as an ordinary soldier — an announcement widely interpreted as an attempt to frame himself as loyal in the face of disgrace.
A Divisive Figure: Feared, Resented, and Indispensable
While many Ukrainian military leaders blamed Yermak for strategic missteps in the early days before Russia’s 2022 invasion, others acknowledged that he also secured diplomatic wins. His team played a key role in getting Washington to adjust its peace proposal, stripping out elements many Ukrainians saw as dangerously favorable to Moscow.
Still, his aggressive management style and large influence over military and political appointments created widespread resentment. Some senior officials accused him of concentrating too much power, while soldiers and veterans often blamed him for delays in adopting stronger defense policies, including mass mobilization.
For many Ukrainians exhausted by blackouts, air attacks, rising prices, and an uncertain future, Yermak became a symbol of a deeper problem: the persistence of corruption and political infighting during wartime.
What Yermak’s Removal Means for Zelenskyy and Ukraine’s War Effort
1. Short-term Political Advantage for Zelenskyy
Some analysts argue that Yermak’s exit actually strengthens Zelenskyy in the immediate future. Western governments — particularly the United States — had long viewed Yermak as a pressure point. His alleged involvement in corruption made him a tool for political leverage over Kyiv.
Removing him dissolves what one analyst described as a “blackmail channel,” potentially giving Ukraine slightly more freedom in upcoming peace negotiations and strategic decisions.
2. A Major Vacancy at a Critical Time
Finding a successor will not be easy. Several names are circulating — including Deputy Prime Minister Mykhailo Fedorov, Defence Minister Denys Shmyhal, and diplomat Serhiy Kyslytsya — but none has Yermak’s deep personal connection with the president or his unmatched influence in government.
Some reports suggest Zelenskyy may consider a lesser-known military figure with frontline experience, aiming to rebuild trust with the armed forces.
3. A Chance to Rebuild Decision-Making Structures
Inside Kyiv, there is debate over whether Zelenskyy should maintain the centralized system Yermak built or open decision-making to officials who clashed with him. Both choices carry risks:
- Keeping the old structure may cause further internal tensions.
- Breaking it apart could slow down wartime coordination.
Either way, Zelenskyy must stabilize the political environment before early 2026 — when Ukraine hopes to regain momentum both diplomatically and militarily.
Long-Term Impact: Uncertain but Potentially Transformative
While the immediate fallout may benefit Zelenskyy, the long-term effects depend heavily on who replaces Yermak and whether key reforms actually follow. The new chief of staff will inherit not only a war but also a fragmented parliament, uneasy Western partners, and a Ukrainian public increasingly anxious about the future.
What is clear is that Yermak’s removal marks the end of a political era — and the beginning of a crucial test for Ukraine’s leadership during its most dangerous moment in modern history.
Leave a Reply