Kochi, January 2, 2026 – Malayalam actor Jayasurya has firmly maintained that all his financial dealings were lawful following questioning by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with a high-profile money laundering investigation. Jayasurya and his wife, Saritha, were interrogated under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) over alleged financial transactions linked to an online investment platform called ‘Save Box’, operated by Swathi Rahim, who is facing multiple allegations of cheating and fraud.

ED Probe Into ‘Save Box’ Scheme

The ED has been investigating claims that the Save Box platform collected funds from investors under misleading pretenses and laundered part of the proceeds through various channels, including the entertainment industry. During the course of its investigation, the agency identified financial transactions involving Jayasurya, who had endorsed the investment scheme as its brand ambassador.

Rahim reportedly informed the investigators that a portion of the funds collected from investors was diverted to the film industry. Some of these amounts were allegedly paid to Jayasurya for his association with the platform, prompting the ED to summon both the actor and his wife for clarification.

Actor’s Response

Taking to Instagram, Jayasurya asserted that he had engaged only in legitimate financial transactions. “I am an ordinary, responsible citizen who followed all rules and paid taxes to the government exchequer,” he wrote. The actor expressed frustration over public speculation regarding the case, stating, “How can we guess what people who approach us for advertisements will do in the future?”

He also addressed reports suggesting that he had been summoned again on January 7, firmly denying them. “We have not received any summons to appear before the ED on January 7,” he clarified.

Details of the Transactions

Sources close to the investigation revealed that Jayasurya first appeared before the ED on December 24, 2025, following a summons. He returned to the agency on December 29, accompanied by his wife, for further questioning.

Investigators examined the financial trail in detail. Rahim allegedly claimed that approximately ₹30 lakh had been transferred to Jayasurya through official banking channels to a business partner of the actor, while a larger sum was purportedly handed over in cash at a boutique managed by Saritha, his wife.

Jayasurya and Saritha reportedly presented documents to the ED demonstrating that a formal endorsement agreementhad been signed with Save Box Concepts Pvt. Ltd. for ₹75 lakh, of which ₹69 lakh had been received via bank transfers. This, according to the couple, was the complete and lawful compensation for the promotional work carried out by the actor.

Ongoing Investigation

The ED is continuing to examine the alleged proceeds of crime generated by Save Box to determine whether any funds were laundered through third parties, including investments in the film industry. The agency’s probe includes verifying the nature and legitimacy of all financial transactions associated with individuals named in connection with the scheme.

Jayasurya’s legal team is reportedly cooperating fully with the ED to provide all necessary documentation and explanations. Sources suggest that the actor is keen to clear his name and demonstrate that his association with Save Box was entirely professional and transparent.

Public Reactions and Industry Impact

News of Jayasurya’s involvement in the ED probe stirred considerable public attention, particularly on social media, where speculation and rumors quickly spread. The actor’s firm statements and detailed disclosure of his earnings and banking transactions aim to reassure fans and stakeholders about the legality of his actions.

In addition to personal clarification, the incident has brought focus to the broader issue of celebrities endorsing investment schemes, highlighting the importance of due diligence before associating with such platforms. Legal experts note that while endorsement fees are normal in the industry, celebrity endorsements can inadvertently intersect with regulatory scrutiny if the platform is later accused of fraud or money laundering.

Conclusion

As of now, Jayasurya continues to assert his innocence, emphasizing that all financial transactions were conducted transparently and in compliance with applicable laws. The ED’s probe into the Save Box scheme remains ongoing, and further inquiries may determine whether any criminal liability exists for those involved. Meanwhile, the actor maintains his professional reputation, assuring fans and the public that he has acted responsibly and lawfully throughout his dealings.

The case underscores the increasing scrutiny of investment platforms and their endorsements, highlighting the need for transparency, regulatory compliance, and accountability in financial transactions, especially when public figures are involved.