A new controversy has emerged around spiritual orator Aniruddhacharya, a widely followed religious speaker, after a complaint was filed against him for allegedly making derogatory and indecent remarks about women. The complaint was submitted by Meera Rathore, district president of the All India Hindu Mahasabha in Agra, and has now been formally accepted by the Mathura Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM). The court has scheduled the next hearing for January 1, 2026, when the complainant’s statement will be recorded, marking the start of formal legal proceedings in the matter.

The case adds to a series of public disputes and legal challenges involving Aniruddhacharya, whose videos and speeches frequently circulate online and often trigger intense debate. As his influence has grown on social media, so too has the scrutiny surrounding his public remarks.

Who Is Aniruddhacharya?

Aniruddhacharya is a spiritual leader, preacher, and social worker who commands a significant following both offline and online. Known for his religious discourses rooted in Sanatan Dharma, he has cultivated a large audience through viral videos and public events. His website describes him as a humanitarian figure committed to uplifting society through devotion, moral teaching, and service-oriented initiatives.

According to biographical details published on his website, Aniruddhacharya was born in Revjha village of Siroha tehsil in Madhya Pradesh. His parents are Ram Naresh Tiwari and Chhaya Bai, and his early life narrative often highlights deep religious influences and traditional values.

The website portrays him not only as a preacher but also as a social service organiser. He reportedly manages an array of charitable activities, including an old age home, animal welfare initiatives, and community food service programmes. One of his notable projects is the Annapurna Rasoi, launched on June 30, 2020. The initiative claims to provide meals to 3,000 to 5,000 people daily, specifically targeting economically vulnerable groups, with the stated aim of offering nourishment and fostering a sense of community among those in need.

His supporters often describe him as a transformative figure connecting people to Gauri Gopal Bhagwan and spreading traditional cultural and spiritual values. However, his critics argue that some of his statements, especially those directed toward women, are regressive or offensive—an issue that now forms the core of the present legal case.

Details of the Complaint and Court Proceedings

The complaint filed by Meera Rathore alleges that Aniruddhacharya made derogatory and inappropriate remarks about women during one of his public addresses. Rathore told ANI that she had previously approached the Vrindavan police station with a complaint but received no response, which led her to escalate the matter to the court.

According to Rathore, she seeks accountability and believes the comments warrant legal consequences. She also made a personal vow connected with the case, saying she would not open her hair braids until he was sent to jail, a symbolic gesture reflecting her commitment to pursuing justice.

The Mathura CJM has taken cognisance of the complaint and registered it as a formal case. Advocate Manish Gupta, representing the complainant, told ANI that the police were asked to submit an investigation report. In the report, the defendants—members associated with Aniruddhacharya—invoked constitutional articles 14, 15, 21 and 29 in their defence. These articles address equality before law, prohibition of discrimination, protection of life and personal liberty, and cultural rights, respectively.

However, Gupta noted that despite citing these constitutional provisions, the defendants did not follow the principles they referred to. According to him, the defence ultimately acknowledged wrongdoing and issued an apology, though the matter will still proceed in court.

Aniruddhacharya has been summoned to appear before the court on January 1, 2026, where the next phase of the proceedings will begin.

Recurring Controversies

This incident is not the first time that Aniruddhacharya’s speeches have attracted controversy. Several of his videos have previously gone viral, drawing criticism for polarising or insensitive content. Although his followers consider his statements as spiritually framed expressions, detractors have frequently accused him of promoting discriminatory or inflammatory views.

His prominence on social media amplifies both his reach and the backlash he receives, making him a polarising figure in contemporary religious discourse.

What Comes Next

The upcoming January 1 hearing will be crucial, as it will include the formal recording of the complainant’s statement. Further court directions will depend on this deposition and subsequent evidence presented. Given his large following and public presence, the case is likely to draw considerable attention in the coming weeks.

While his supporters continue to highlight his social service contributions and spiritual influence, the legal scrutiny surrounding his statements reflects growing societal sensitivity toward derogatory remarks, particularly those directed at women. The proceedings also underline the importance of accountability for public figures whose words carry significant influence.

As the case moves forward, it will test not only Aniruddhacharya’s legal defence but also the broader public debate surrounding responsible speech, gender sensitivity, and the limits of religious oratory in contemporary India.