In a serious development that has raised concerns about political safety in Bihar, Tej Pratap Yadav, chief of the Janshakti Janata Dal (JJD), has formally sought security protection from the state government, citing threats to his life from a former party leader. The JJD chief’s appeal comes amid a growing feud with Santosh Renu Yadav, the party’s former national spokesperson, whom Tej Pratap has accused of issuing death threats against him on multiple occasions.

Speaking to reporters on Sunday, Tej Pratap Yadav said, “I am in danger, that’s why I have demanded security. I have written a letter to Bihar’s Deputy Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary and have filed an FIR at the Sachivalaya police station.” This statement came shortly after Tej Pratap officially wrote to Choudhary, the state’s Home Minister, emphasizing the severity of the threats against him. He has also lodged a complaint with the Secretariat police station in Patna, seeking immediate action to ensure his safety.

Allegations Against Santosh Renu Yadav

In his detailed letter to the Home Minister, Tej Pratap Yadav outlined a series of allegations against Santosh Renu Yadav, who once served as the national spokesperson of the Janshakti Janata Dal. According to the JJD chief, Santosh Renu Yadav had engaged in activities “contrary to the ideology of the party,” which included alleged extortion and misuse of his position.

The letter stated, “We want to inform you that Santosh Renu Yadav, father of Namashish Yadav, is a resident of Vairam Chak, Yana-Masandi. We had appointed Santosh Renu Yadav as the national spokesperson of our party, Janshakti Janata Dal. But after joining the party, Santosh Renu Yadav, while working from his residence at 28 M Strand Road, was continuously doing things contrary to the ideology of the party, such as taking money from people in the name of getting work done.”

The JJD chief specifically cited an incident involving a resident of Motihari district named Mantu Gop, alleging that Santosh Renu Yadav had extorted thousands of rupees from him by promising to facilitate certain services. Tej Pratap’s letter further accused Santosh Renu of using intimidation tactics, asserting, “By scaring and threatening many people, this person has committed the heinous act of extorting money from people in an illegal manner.”

Expulsion from the Party

According to the letter, the matter was brought to Tej Pratap Yadav’s attention, and efforts were made to address the issue internally. “When the matter was brought to my attention, I tried my best to reason with Santosh Renu Yadav, but he only lied to us. Consequently, the party’s Central Disciplinary Committee expelled Santosh Renu Yadav from the party on Sunday, December 14, 2025 (Expulsion Letter No. 37/JJD/2025),” Tej Pratap stated.

This formal expulsion followed months of alleged misconduct and conflicts within the party, reflecting deeper challenges in maintaining discipline and accountability among party functionaries. Tej Pratap emphasized that Santosh Renu Yadav’s behaviour not only violated the party’s code of conduct but also posed a direct threat to his personal safety.

Alleged Death Threats on Social Media

Beyond the allegations of financial impropriety and extortion, Tej Pratap Yadav claimed that Santosh Renu Yadav had been repeatedly threatening him through social media platforms. “But ever since Santosh Renu Yadav was suspended from the party, he has been continuously using offensive language and issuing death threats against me through live videos on social media platforms like Facebook and YouTube. This is not appropriate under any circumstances,” the letter read.

The JJD chief highlighted that these threats were not isolated incidents but part of a sustained campaign of intimidation that had created a climate of fear. By making the issue public and seeking government intervention, Tej Pratap aimed to ensure that the state authorities take immediate preventive measures to safeguard his life.

Political and Legal Implications

The allegations made by Tej Pratap Yadav against a former party spokesperson underline the complex intersection of politics and personal security in Bihar, where political leaders often face threats from within and outside their own parties. Filing an FIR at the Sachivalaya police station and officially requesting state-provided security are procedural steps that signal the seriousness of the matter.

By formally approaching the Home Minister, Tej Pratap has placed responsibility on the state administration to investigate the claims and ensure that law enforcement agencies take appropriate action to protect him. This includes monitoring the alleged perpetrator’s social media activity, as well as considering protective measures such as personal security personnel or other safeguards.

Background of the Janshakti Janata Dal Conflict

The Janshakti Janata Dal, a relatively smaller political party in Bihar, has witnessed internal disputes over the past year. Tej Pratap Yadav, as party chief, has repeatedly emphasized the importance of maintaining discipline and upholding the party’s ideological values. However, allegations such as those against Santosh Renu Yadav illustrate the challenges that arise when party functionaries engage in activities perceived as unethical or criminal.

While internal disciplinary measures, including the formation of a Central Disciplinary Committee, are intended to address such issues, the escalation to threats against the party chief demonstrates how internal conflicts can quickly become matters of public safety and law enforcement concern.

Public and Media Attention

The filing of the FIR and the public disclosure of the threats have attracted attention from media outlets across Bihar, highlighting concerns about the safety of political leaders and the accountability of party members. Political analysts suggest that such incidents underscore the need for robust internal mechanisms within parties to prevent abuse of power and to manage conflicts before they escalate into threats to personal safety.

Tej Pratap Yadav’s proactive approach—publicly reporting the threats and demanding state intervention—may set a precedent for other political leaders who face similar situations. By leveraging both legal avenues and public communication, the JJD chief has ensured that the matter receives timely attention from both authorities and the public.

Next Steps for Investigation

With the FIR lodged at the Secretariat police station and a formal letter sent to the Home Minister, the next steps are likely to involve a thorough investigation into the allegations. Law enforcement authorities may summon Santosh Renu Yadav for questioning, review evidence from the alleged social media threats, and assess whether further preventive measures are necessary to secure Tej Pratap Yadav’s safety.

Given the seriousness of the accusations, authorities will need to balance immediate protective actions with a fair investigation of the claims to ensure justice for all parties involved. Meanwhile, the public and political observers will be closely monitoring developments to see how Bihar’s law enforcement machinery responds to a politically sensitive security threat.

Conclusion

The unfolding situation involving Tej Pratap Yadav and Santosh Renu Yadav brings into sharp focus the intersection of political conflict, personal safety, and legal accountability. By publicly seeking security and lodging formal complaints, the JJD chief has highlighted the severity of the threats against him and the necessity for immediate government action.

As political parties navigate internal disputes, incidents like this serve as a reminder of the importance of strict disciplinary mechanisms, transparency, and timely intervention to prevent conflicts from escalating into threats against personal safety. In the coming weeks, the response from Bihar’s administration, as well as the legal proceedings against Santosh Renu Yadav, will be crucial in setting a precedent for handling similar cases in the state’s political landscape.