In a disturbing case that highlights the dangers of online deception and sexual coercion, a Singapore court has sentenced Rajwant Singh Gill Narajan Singh, an Indian-origin man, to 12 years in prison and 15 strokes of the cane for duping three women into sexual acts and recording them. The 38-year-old, a Malaysian citizen, was found guilty of coercing the victims while posing as a wealthy Caucasian “sugar daddy” on dating apps.

The Modus Operandi

According to court documents, Singh, despite being married with children, created a fake identity online to lure women into sexual encounters under the promise of financial compensation. He used platforms designed for dating and companionship to present himself as an affluent foreigner, leveraging the illusion of wealth to manipulate his victims.

The women, identified only as PW1, PW2, and V3 in court records, were coerced into sexual activities with Singh. In several cases, he filmed these acts and used the recordings as leverage to extort money. The court described his crimes as “depraved, sadistic and malicious.”

One of Singh’s victims, PW1, suffered significant psychological harm and was later diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder. PW2 reportedly left Singapore after being filmed without her consent, while V3 was lured under the promise of becoming Singh’s girlfriend with a monthly payment of $20,000. Singh, however, never fulfilled this promise and instead threatened to publicize explicit footage to demand money from her.

In the case of V3, Singh had assumed the alias “Michael Nolan,” claiming to be a wealthy American trader living on a yacht in Malaysia. He convinced her that her cooperation would lead to financial rewards, only to exploit her sexually and threaten her with exposure.

Investigation and Arrest

The Singapore Police Force was first alerted to the incident on January 28, 2020. A joint operation with the Royal Malaysian Police Force led to Singh’s arrest shortly afterward. In 2020, he was charged with two counts of cheating involving two of the victims. He pleaded guilty, and in 2025, he was sentenced to four and a half years in jail and ordered to pay $5,437 in compensation.

However, further investigation revealed the full extent of his crimes, leading to the recent conviction and enhanced sentence. On January 13, 2026, the Singapore court handed down a 12-year prison term and 15 strokes of the cane, reflecting the seriousness of his offenses and the ongoing threat posed to vulnerable individuals by such fraudulent schemes.

Court Observations

The court highlighted the malicious and coercive nature of Singh’s conduct, noting that he exploited not only the victims’ trust but also their vulnerability. By creating a fake identity and promising financial support, he manipulated the women into sexual acts that he then used as leverage for extortion.

The judgment emphasized that Singh’s actions were deliberate and calculated, targeting multiple victims over an extended period. His ability to continue the scheme despite being married and having children was noted as particularly egregious, underscoring the cold and manipulative intent behind the crimes.

Legal and Social Implications

The case serves as a cautionary tale about the risks posed by online dating platforms and the potential for digital deception. It also underscores the importance of cross-border cooperation in law enforcement. The joint operation between Singapore and Malaysia’s police forces was critical in apprehending Singh and bringing him to justice.

Moreover, the ruling sends a clear message regarding the severity of sexual coercion and online exploitation. By imposing both imprisonment and caning, the Singapore judiciary emphasized the dual objectives of punishment and deterrence, particularly in cases involving multiple victims and abuse of trust.

Victim Impact

The psychological toll on the victims cannot be overstated. PW1’s diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder reflects the lasting emotional impact of coercion and exploitation. PW2’s decision to leave Singapore indicates the fear and social consequences that victims often face. V3’s experience highlights how financial promises can be weaponized to manipulate and control victims, further compounding trauma.

The court’s sentencing, therefore, not only addresses the crimes themselves but also acknowledges the long-term effects on victims’ mental and emotional wellbeing.

Conclusion

Rajwant Singh Gill’s conviction and sentence serve as a stark reminder of the dangers posed by digital deception and sexual exploitation. Singapore’s rigorous response, including cross-border police collaboration, a lengthy prison sentence, and corporal punishment, underscores the seriousness with which such crimes are treated.

As online platforms continue to grow in popularity, cases like Singh’s highlight the need for vigilance, education, and robust legal frameworks to protect vulnerable individuals from predators who exploit technology for personal gain.

This case also emphasizes that marital status or family ties do not excuse manipulative or criminal behavior; deliberate deception and coercion for sexual or financial gain will face stringent legal consequences.