Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant on Friday underscored the transformative potential of mediation in India’s judicial system, asserting that it should not be viewed as a sign of weakness, but rather as the highest evolution of law. Speaking at a national conference and symposium on mediation, the CJI elaborated on the broader vision for dispute resolution, advocating for a multi-door courthouse system, a participatory approach to justice, and a compassionate legal response to societal challenges such as drug addiction.
The event, titled “National Conference and Symposium on Mediation: How Far Significant in the Present-Day Context,” was organized by the Bar Council of India and the Bar Council of India Trust – Pearl First, in collaboration with the India International University of Legal Education and Research (IIULER), Goa. CJI Surya Kant inaugurated the two-day symposium and addressed a gathering of judges, lawyers, academics, and policymakers, emphasizing the historical, cultural, and social dimensions of mediation.
Mediation: A Cultural and Judicial Evolution
CJI Surya Kant argued that mediation represents a shift from a purely adjudicatory culture to one focused on participation and harmony. “Mediation is not a sign of the weakness of the law,” he said. “Rather, it is the highest evolution. It is the true transition from the culture of adjudication, where we merely manage conflicts. We are now moving to a culture of participation where we actively cultivate harmony.”
The Chief Justice elaborated that mediation is not a Western import but a concept deeply rooted in India’s cultural heritage. “In truth, we are not learning a new discipline; we are simply remembering a language we once spoke with fluent ease. Mediation is the genius of our soil. It is the ancient art of kshama, reclaimed and recontextualized for a modern era,” he said. By invoking kshama, the CJI linked contemporary dispute resolution to centuries-old Indian practices of patience, forgiveness, and reconciliation, arguing that mediation restores relationships rather than merely assigning blame.
Litigation vs. Mediation
The Chief Justice contrasted litigation and mediation with vivid metaphors. He described litigation as the “autopsy of a dead relationship,” a clinical dissection that examines what went wrong, often leaving the connection between parties irreparably damaged. Mediation, by contrast, was described as “a remedial surgery that seeks to preserve the living pulse of a connection,” emphasizing restoration, dialogue, and reconciliation.
According to CJI Surya Kant, the judiciary’s role is evolving beyond adjudication to actively facilitate harmony and resolution. Mediation, he argued, provides an avenue for parties to participate in resolving their disputes meaningfully, ensuring outcomes that reflect the nuances of each case rather than relying solely on the rigid application of legal statutes.
Multi-Door Courthouse System
A key part of the CJI’s vision is the concept of a multi-door courthouse system, which he described as a “visionary concept where the court ceases to be a singular venue for trials and becomes a comprehensive centre for dispute resolution.” In such a system, courts would offer multiple avenues—mediation, arbitration, and litigation—tailored to the specific nature of grievances.
“This is the ultimate empowerment of the litigant,” he explained. “The method of resolution is as nuanced and varied as the dispute itself. It ensures that justice is not merely punitive, but adaptive, participatory, and restorative.” By integrating mediation and alternative dispute resolution mechanisms within the formal court framework, the judiciary can reduce pendency, enhance access to justice, and preserve social harmony.
Compassionate Approach to Drug Abuse
Earlier on Friday, the CJI launched a 30-day awareness campaign titled ‘Drug Abuse: A Menace to Society,’ organized by the Goa State Legal Services Authority. He stressed that while the law must respond firmly to traffickers and those who profit from human vulnerability, a compassionate approach is essential for first-time users and young adults struggling with addiction.
“The law’s response must be different when it encounters a first-time user, a student, or a young adult struggling with dependency,” he said. “In such cases, the central question is no longer one of culpability; it becomes a question of recovery. Punishment alone cannot be the end. Justice must ask whether it is merely closing a case or preserving a future that might otherwise be lost.”
The CJI emphasized the need for a balanced, coordinated approach to drug abuse, combining deterrence, treatment, and social reintegration. He noted that no single institution can effectively address substance abuse alone, and that fragmented efforts often allow addiction to persist. “Where institutions act together, the response becomes preventive rather than reactive, compassionate rather than punitive. Justice in India can be firm without being cruel, and compassionate without being naive,” he added.
Tribute to Goa Nightclub Tragedy Victims
CJI Surya Kant also paid tribute to the 25 individuals who lost their lives in the recent Goa nightclub fire, describing it as “a profound loss for their loved ones and a tragedy for our entire nation.” He expressed condolences to the victims’ families, noting that they included both young individuals enjoying leisure time and staff members working hard to support their families. “We mourn the loss of many young lives,” he said.
Significance and Broader Implications
The CJI’s address highlights several critical dimensions of contemporary justice:
- Restorative Justice: Mediation preserves relationships and encourages reconciliation, moving away from purely adversarial proceedings.
- Judicial Innovation: The multi-door courthouse model reflects a shift toward integrated dispute resolution, offering litigants more choices and tailored outcomes.
- Cultural Continuity: By linking mediation to ancient Indian principles like kshama, the judiciary roots modern legal practice in a historically familiar framework.
- Compassionate Legal Response: In addressing societal issues like drug abuse, the CJI advocates a nuanced, context-sensitive approach, balancing deterrence with recovery.
- Access and Efficiency: A participatory system and alternative dispute resolution mechanisms can reduce case backlogs and improve access to justice.
Conclusion
CJI Surya Kant’s remarks underscore that mediation and restorative justice are not signs of judicial weakness, but rather represent a mature, evolved approach to law. By emphasizing participation, cultural resonance, and compassion, he envisions a judiciary that resolves disputes effectively while preserving human relationships and social harmony.
His call for a multi-door courthouse system and a coordinated response to social issues like drug abuse reflects a broader vision of justice that is firm yet humane, rigorous yet compassionate. In linking the ancient wisdom of kshama with modern legal frameworks, CJI Surya Kant has outlined a path for India’s judicial system that is innovative, participatory, and deeply human-centric.
The symposium in Goa thus served not only as a platform to discuss mediation but also as a blueprint for the future of judicial reform in India, highlighting the potential for a more adaptive, responsive, and compassionate legal system.
Leave a Reply