In a development that could bring significant relief to farmers along Punjab’s India-Pakistan border, Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann announced that the Union government has agreed “in principle” to shift the border security fence closer to the actual international boundary. The announcement came after Mann’s meeting with Union Home Minister Amit Shah, in which the Chief Minister said the matter is “under active consideration” by the Centre. While no official communication has been issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs, the move, if implemented, promises to resolve longstanding hardships faced by farmers whose lands lie between the current fence and the zero line of the international border.

What the Fence Shifting Means

The fence in question is not the actual international boundary but a wire-mesh barricade installed in the 1990s to curb cross-border infiltration. In several areas of Punjab, this fence lies deep inside Indian territory, in some cases 2–3 kilometers from the actual border. International norms suggest that border fencing should be erected at least 150 meters beyond the zero line, but the original alignment in Punjab, largely dictated by security considerations at the time, left thousands of acres of farmland on the “wrong side” of the barricade.

Over the decades, this has meant that farmers needing to access their fields beyond the fence were subject to strict security checks, time restrictions, and escort requirements by the Border Security Force (BSF). Cropping schedules, irrigation, and farm labor management were affected, causing both economic and psychological stress for farmers in the border belt.

According to CM Mann, shifting the fence closer to the actual international border would allow these lands to come “inside the fence,” restoring farmers’ freedom to cultivate their own land without undergoing daily hurdles imposed by security protocols.

Scope of the Border Fence

The Punjab sector of the India-Pakistan border stretches approximately 523 kilometers, of which over 90 percent is fenced, excluding riverine stretches along the Ravi and Sutlej, as well as certain marshy areas. The fence was originally constructed as a security measure and is closely monitored by the BSF.

However, the placement deep inside Indian territory has had unintended consequences. Farmers have often needed to cross the fence under supervision, which not only affects daily farming routines but also reduces irrigation efficiency, particularly where tube-well connections are located on the far side of the fence. In addition, strict timing regulations, typically from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., have constrained agricultural activity, reducing yields and adding stress to women, laborers, and family members involved in farm work.

AAP leader Kuldeep Dhaliwal highlighted the practical difficulties, noting that the realignment of the fence would remove these constraints and allow for uninterrupted farming activities, while reducing security-induced hardships that have persisted for decades.

Why the Move Matters Now

The proposal comes at a time when border security remains a sensitive issue, particularly following cross-border tensions such as Operation Sindoor in May of last year. While national security considerations remain paramount, the government’s approach now seeks a balance between security imperatives and the rights and livelihoods of farmersliving along the international border.

Shifting the fence does not compromise national security; instead, it represents a technical and strategic realignment of the security infrastructure. By moving the barricade closer to the actual international boundary, the government can ensure that security objectives are maintained while unlocking thousands of acres of productive farmland for unrestricted use by local farmers.

Who Will Benefit

The realignment, if approved and implemented, will primarily benefit farmers in villages and agricultural zones located between the current fence and the zero line of the border. Many of these farmers have been forced to schedule farming around BSF patrols, face time-bound access restrictions, and manage irrigation problems due to inaccessible tubewells located on the far side of the fence.

According to Mann and supporting statements from local leaders, the shift will restore autonomy to farmers, improve efficiency in field operations, and eliminate daily uncertainties that have disrupted livelihoods for decades. Women and farm laborers, who often bear the brunt of logistical and physical challenges due to restricted access, will also experience significant relief.

Historical Context of the Border Fence

The security fencing in Punjab has its origins in the early 1990s, following a period of heightened cross-border infiltration and militancy. At that time, placing the fence deep inside Indian territory was considered essential to provide a buffer zone for security forces to respond to any incursions. Over the years, as security conditions stabilized, the continued positioning of the fence inside Indian territory created practical problems for local populations, without substantially adding to the security buffer in most areas.

Potential Impact on Agriculture and Economy

Punjab, being the breadbasket of India, relies heavily on efficient and timely agricultural practices. Delays and restrictions in accessing farmland, as imposed by the old fence alignment, have direct economic implications. Crops that require daily monitoring, irrigation, or protection from pests and animals are particularly affected. Realigning the fence could lead to improved crop management, higher yields, and reduced economic loss, strengthening the local agrarian economy.

Experts note that such infrastructure realignment represents a rare instance where national security policy intersects with rural livelihoods, demonstrating the potential for policy recalibration that protects citizens’ rights without compromising border integrity.

Next Steps and Implementation

While the Centre has agreed “in principle” to the proposal, Punjab CM Mann emphasized that the matter is still under active consideration. No formal notifications or official communications have been released by the Ministry of Home Affairs yet. Implementation will require careful coordination between the Union government, the BSF, Punjab state authorities, and local communities to ensure that the fence is realigned effectively without creating gaps in security.

Officials will need to assess specific stretches where the fence is located unusually deep inside Punjab territory and determine technical feasibility, security implications, and construction requirements for moving it closer to the international border.

Conclusion

The potential shift of the border fence in Punjab represents a significant relief for farmers who have long faced logistical, economic, and psychological challenges due to restricted access to their own land. By bringing thousands of acres inside the accessible zone, the move could eliminate daily hardships, streamline farming operations, and improve irrigation management, all while maintaining the integrity of India’s border security.

For farmers along the Punjab sector of the India-Pakistan border, this proposed realignment is more than a bureaucratic adjustment—it is an opportunity to reclaim autonomy over their lands, secure livelihoods, and cultivate without the daily uncertainty of armed escorts, restricted access, and security-imposed time limits.

As discussions continue between the Punjab government and the Union Home Ministry, stakeholders across the region await formal approval and a timeline for implementation, hoping that this long-awaited measure will translate into tangible benefits for India’s border farming communities.

---