The Supreme Court of India is set to hear the Central Bureau of Investigation’s (CBI) appeal on December 29 challenging the Delhi High Court’s decision to suspend the life sentence of expelled BJP leader Kuldeep Singh Sengar in the high-profile Unnao rape case. The case, which has drawn widespread national attention since 2017, has once again brought issues of criminal justice, victim protection, and law enforcement accountability to the forefront.

Background: The Unnao Rape Case

Kuldeep Singh Sengar, a former Bharatiya Janata Party legislator from Uttar Pradesh, was convicted in December 2019 for the rape of a minor girl in Unnao. The court had sentenced him to life imprisonment along with a fine of ₹25 lakh. Over the years, the case has been marred by multiple controversies, including allegations of police collusion, judicial lapses, and attempts to intimidate the victim and her family.

The Delhi High Court, in a December 23, 2025, order, suspended Sengar’s life sentence pending appeal and granted him bail. This decision prompted the CBI to file a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Supreme Court, seeking to overturn the bail order. A three-judge vacation bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant will hear the plea.

Sengar remains in jail despite the bail because he is serving a 10-year sentence in another CBI case related to murder, ensuring that he continues to be incarcerated even if the Supreme Court upholds his bail in the rape case.

Victim Allegations of Misconduct

Amid the legal proceedings, the victim and her mother have raised serious allegations against the investigating officer (IO) handling the case. On December 27, they met officials of the CBI in New Delhi to submit a formal complaint alleging collusion between the IO and a judicial authority, aimed at favoring the accused and undermining the victim’s case.

Speaking to reporters after the meeting, the victim stated, “The complaint is that the investigating officer has wronged me. He colluded with the judge to ensure that the other party won, so that the rape victim would lose, her courage would be broken, and she would not be able to pursue the case further.”

She further explained that she had attempted to meet a senior official at the CBI but was told it was a holiday and that she should return on Monday. However, a junior official accepted her complaint and assured her that a senior officer would meet them on Monday.

The victim’s mother echoed the concerns, expressing hope that the Supreme Court will safeguard her daughter’s interests. She told ANI, “They have received my complaint. Now we have to see when the authority meets us. We trust the Supreme Court.” She added that while the CBI is currently handling the matter, the family’s confidence will depend on whether the agency stands by them in court proceedings.

Legal and Procedural Context

The Special Leave Petition filed by the CBI seeks to challenge the Delhi High Court’s decision on two grounds:

1. Suspension of Life Sentence: The High Court allowed the suspension of Sengar’s life sentence pending the appeal, effectively granting him temporary freedom. The CBI argues that such suspension is not justified given the gravity of the crime and the risk to the victim and public interest.
2. Grant of Bail: The bail order has been contested because the accused has multiple serious convictions, including the Unnao rape case and a murder case. Granting bail, the CBI contends, could undermine the principle of justice and set a dangerous precedent in cases involving sexual violence and public figures.

The Supreme Court, under Chief Justice Surya Kant, will examine whether the Delhi High Court erred in suspending the sentence and granting bail. The bench is expected to consider arguments related to risk to public safety, potential witness intimidation, and the credibility of law enforcement investigations.

Public and Media Attention

The Unnao case has remained in public discourse for years, partly because of the accused’s political profile and partly due to the alleged systemic failures in protecting the victim. Multiple reports and media coverage have highlighted incidents of harassment, attempts to bribe witnesses, and delays in the investigation.

The latest allegations by the victim against the IO — suggesting collusion with judicial authorities — add a new layer of controversy, raising questions about procedural integrity and the accountability of law enforcement officials.

Legal experts note that the Supreme Court’s intervention is crucial not only for ensuring justice in this case but also for reinforcing trust in India’s criminal justice system, particularly in cases of sexual violence.

Victim Protection and Legal Safeguards

India’s legal framework includes provisions to protect rape victims, including in-camera trials, fast-track courts, and victim compensation schemes. However, cases involving politically influential accused often see delays, intimidation, and allegations of collusion.

The victim’s decision to submit a complaint to the CBI alleging misconduct by the investigating officer underscores the challenges faced by survivors in navigating complex legal processes. It also highlights the importance of independent oversight and strict adherence to procedural protocols.

CBI officials have confirmed receipt of the complaint and assured that it will be addressed appropriately. However, the effectiveness of any remedial action will largely depend on whether the agency can act without influence or bias and maintain transparency during legal proceedings.

Broader Implications

The hearing on December 29 is significant for several reasons:

• Legal Precedent: The Supreme Court’s decision could set a precedent regarding the suspension of sentences and bail in cases of sexual violence involving high-profile accused.
• Victim Confidence: Upholding the principles of justice can reinforce victim confidence in law enforcement and judicial mechanisms.
• Political Accountability: The case also serves as a test of political accountability, given Sengar’s former status as a legislator.

Legal analysts suggest that the Supreme Court may also address the allegations of misconduct against the investigating officer, potentially directing the CBI to ensure independent and unbiased handling of sensitive cases.

Conclusion

As the CBI prepares to argue its appeal in the Supreme Court, the Unnao rape case remains a litmus test for justice in politically sensitive sexual violence cases in India. The proceedings scheduled for December 29 will be closely watched by legal experts, civil society, and the media, as the nation awaits a verdict that could reaffirm the principles of justice, accountability, and victim protection.

For the victim and her family, the Supreme Court hearing represents not just a legal battle but also a fight for credibility, dignity, and closure after years of trauma and legal wrangling. The outcome will have far-reaching implications for the handling of sexual violence cases, law enforcement accountability, and the broader discourse on justice in India.

---