In a significant move in the United States, four members of the House of Representatives have introduced a resolution seeking formal recognition of the 1984 anti-Sikh riots in India as a “genocide.” The resolution, spearheaded by Republican Congressman David Valadao, calls for commemorating the violent events that followed the assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and urges that all perpetrators, “regardless of rank or status,” be held accountable.

The proposed resolution identifies the 1984 violence, which led to the deaths of thousands of Sikhs across India, as a deliberate orchestration involving state institutions, government authorities, and political leaders. It frames the riots not as spontaneous unrest but as a systemic and coordinated attack on the Sikh community. By labelling the events a genocide, the lawmakers aim to formally acknowledge the severity of the violence and the ongoing grievances of Sikh communities both in India and abroad.

In addition to Congressman Valadao, the resolution has found support among other lawmakers, including California Congressman Jim Costa, who emphasized the personal resonance of the events for Sikh communities in the United States. “As we mark the 40th anniversary of the Sikh Genocide, we remember a dark chapter in history that inflicted pain on Sikh families and communities,” Costa said. “This is not just a distant tragedy—it hits home for us here in the San Joaquin Valley, where so many of our Sikh neighbors have shared their stories of loss, survival, and resilience. This resolution is more than a symbol—it’s a time to recognize this horrific time that our Sikh community experienced.”

The legislative initiative is backed by multiple Sikh advocacy groups in the United States, including the Sikh Coalition, the American Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee, the American Sikh Caucus Committee, and the Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund. These organizations have long campaigned for justice and remembrance of the 1984 riots, seeking to highlight the historical and ongoing impacts of the tragedy on Sikh communities worldwide.

While this is not the first attempt by US lawmakers to address the events of 1984, it represents one of the most direct efforts to classify them as genocide. An identical resolution introduced by Congressman Valadao in October 2024 did not reach a floor vote, highlighting the complex political and diplomatic considerations surrounding the issue. The renewed effort, however, coincides with the 40th anniversary of the riots, giving the proposal symbolic and historical weight.

The resolution’s text explicitly accuses the Indian government, state institutions, and members of parliament of orchestrating and enabling the riots. During the aftermath of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s assassination in October 1984, anti-Sikh violence erupted in several Indian cities, particularly in Delhi. Reports documented widespread killings, arson, and destruction of property targeting Sikh neighborhoods. Survivors and human rights groups have long argued that law enforcement and political authorities failed to intervene effectively, with some accused of actively facilitating the violence.

By calling the 1984 events a genocide, the US lawmakers are framing the issue not just as communal violence but as a systematic campaign against a specific religious group, invoking international human rights norms. The resolution also stresses the need for accountability, demanding that those responsible for orchestrating or facilitating the attacks face legal consequences. This aligns with ongoing advocacy by Sikh organizations, which have sought justice for victims and recognition of the historical injustice both in India and internationally.

Historically, US congressional interventions on matters related to Sikh Americans and the 1984 riots have had bilateral implications, sometimes creating tensions between Washington and New Delhi. During the 1980s and 1990s, resolutions condemning discrimination against Sikhs or calling for investigations into the riots occasionally led to diplomatic friction, reflecting the sensitive nature of foreign legislative involvement in India’s domestic affairs. The current resolution, however, focuses on commemoration and accountability, with supporters framing it as recognition of a human rights tragedy rather than a critique of contemporary Indian governance.

The Indian Embassy in Washington, D.C., and the Ministry of External Affairs have not issued a public comment regarding the resolution. Analysts note that the absence of an official response is consistent with India’s traditional approach of refraining from commenting on foreign legislative initiatives that involve historical domestic issues. Nonetheless, the resolution is likely to be closely monitored in diplomatic circles, given its potential to affect India-US relations and the perception of India’s handling of historical communal violence.

Sikh American communities have welcomed the resolution as a crucial step in acknowledging the historical trauma endured by their community. Over the decades, advocacy organizations have sought not only recognition of the events but also education and commemoration efforts in schools, media, and government institutions. They argue that formal recognition by the US House of Representatives would serve as a moral affirmation for survivors and descendants, many of whom migrated to North America in the years following the violence.

In the US context, recognition of the 1984 anti-Sikh riots as genocide would place the events alongside other historical atrocities formally acknowledged by Congress, reinforcing the importance of historical memory in shaping policy and human rights advocacy. It also reflects the increasing visibility and political influence of Sikh Americans in certain states, particularly in California, New York, and the Midwest, where the Sikh diaspora has established strong community and advocacy networks.

The resolution also addresses broader historical patterns of discrimination against Sikhs, noting that members of the community have faced targeted violence and prejudice both in India and abroad. By acknowledging the 1984 riots as genocide, the lawmakers aim to highlight the systematic nature of the persecution and the long-term need for justice and historical recognition.

Observers note that while the resolution is largely symbolic, its passage could exert moral and diplomatic pressure on India to continue addressing unresolved cases related to the riots. Over the past four decades, numerous judicial inquiries in India have attempted to investigate the 1984 events, but activists and community members have often criticized these efforts as slow, inconsistent, and incomplete. The US resolution could serve as an international reminder of these unresolved grievances.

As the legislative process unfolds, the resolution will need to pass through committee hearings and a floor vote in the House of Representatives. Given the political and diplomatic sensitivity, its journey is uncertain, but it represents one of the most concerted efforts in recent years by the US legislative branch to formally memorialize the 1984 anti-Sikh riotsand demand accountability for the victims and survivors.

With the 40th anniversary of the tragedy prompting renewed attention, the resolution underscores the intersection of diaspora advocacy, human rights, and international diplomacy, highlighting the ways in which historical events continue to resonate decades later and influence political discourse globally.

---