Updated on: Nov 09, 2025

An FIR has been lodged against a high-profile cyber fraud accused, currently in jail, for allegedly sending a threatening email to a judge of the Allahabad High Court using a police constable’s phone. The accused, Anubhav Mittal, who is already embroiled in a massive ₹3,700-crore scam, reportedly orchestrated the act from Lucknow jail in an attempt to implicate a fellow inmate.

According to police officials, Mittal, accused of duping nearly seven lakh investors through a fraudulent online trading scheme, sent the email under a fake identity. The message contained threats stating that a judge of the Lucknow bench “was going to be murdered.” Authorities allege that Mittal intended to frame another inmate, Anandeshwar Agrahari, who has been lodged in jail since December 2023 in a murder case, apparently due to personal enmity.

The investigation revealed that the threatening email was sent using the mobile phone of constable Ajay Kumar, who is posted at the Police Lines. Mittal allegedly borrowed the phone during a court hearing on November 4, ostensibly to check the status of his own case. According to police sources, he then secretly created a new email ID and set a timer to auto-send the threatening message the following morning.

A senior police official confirmed the registration of an FIR against both Mittal and Constable Ajay Kumar under charges of criminal intimidation and provisions of the Information Technology Act. “The FIR was registered on Friday. The police constable had accompanied Mittal during a hearing in court on November 4. Mittal borrowed the phone and used it to send the threatening email,” the official said.

Mittal’s criminal history is extensive. Arrested in 2017 by a special task force, he is currently facing 324 criminal casesconnected to the ₹3,700-crore online trading scam. His wife, Ayushi Mittal, and father, Sunil Mittal, are also co-accused and remain in judicial custody. The scam involved luring investors into a fraudulent online trading platform, promising high returns while systematically siphoning off their money. The case is considered one of India’s largest financial frauds in recent years, impacting thousands of investors across the country.

The latest incident underscores the audacity of Mittal and raises questions about jail security and monitoring of high-risk inmates. Cyber crime investigators from the Crime Branch and Cyber Cell have launched a detailed inquiry to determine how Mittal was able to misuse a police officer’s phone from inside the prison and whether any lapses facilitated the act. Authorities are also reviewing whether similar attempts have been made by Mittal or other inmates in the past.

Police sources noted that the email was carefully timed and disguised, with Mittal attempting to hide his identity while casting suspicion on Agrahari. “This was a premeditated attempt to create fear and mislead authorities. The use of a police officer’s device to execute such a threat shows significant planning and intent,” said an officer involved in the investigation.

This incident comes at a time when India’s cybercrime mechanisms and prison security protocols are under scrutiny. High-profile inmates, especially those involved in multi-crore financial frauds, are often considered flight risks or capable of orchestrating complex schemes even while in custody. The Mittal case highlights vulnerabilities in jail monitoring, particularly regarding access to mobile phones and other digital devices.

The Cyber Cell is now coordinating with prison authorities to strengthen safeguards and prevent misuse of devices by inmates. Constable Ajay Kumar’s role is under investigation to determine whether the act was facilitated intentionally or due to negligence. Authorities have emphasized that both Mittal and Kumar will face legal consequences if found culpable.

Legal experts say that the case carries serious implications. Threatening a sitting judge constitutes criminal intimidation, and using digital means to do so falls under the IT Act, making the offence non-bailable and punishable with stringent penalties. Additionally, attempting to frame another individual for a crime further compounds Mittal’s legal troubles.

The Allahabad High Court has been informed of the FIR, and security protocols around judges are being reviewed in light of the threat. Judicial sources said that the matter is being taken extremely seriously, given the potential risk to the integrity of the judicial process and the safety of court officers.

Observers note that Mittal’s case illustrates the intersection of white-collar crime, cybercrime, and prison security challenges in India. While convicted of financial frauds affecting thousands, Mittal’s ability to plan a digital threat from jail highlights systemic gaps in monitoring and controlling access to digital communication by high-risk inmates.

Authorities are expected to conduct a thorough inquiry, including forensic examination of the phone used to send the email, logs of all communications by Mittal in recent days, and potential lapses by jail personnel. Depending on the findings, further criminal charges could be filed against Mittal, Constable Ajay Kumar, or any other individuals found complicit.

The investigation has also renewed calls from legal experts and prison reform advocates for stricter monitoring of inmates’ access to mobile devices and digital communication tools. They argue that high-profile convicts, especially those with extensive criminal networks, pose a significant risk if they can manipulate digital platforms to threaten, intimidate, or harass individuals outside the prison system.

The FIR against Mittal and the police constable represents a decisive step by law enforcement to ensure accountability and safeguard the judiciary. Police officials have reiterated their commitment to pursuing the matter with the seriousness it deserves, emphasizing that any attempt to intimidate judges or influence the judicial process will be met with the full force of the law.

In summary, Anubhav Mittal, the jailed fraudster accused in a multi-thousand crore scam, has allegedly sent a threatening email to an Allahabad High Court judge using a police constable’s phone. The FIR against both Mittal and the constable has been lodged under provisions of criminal intimidation and the IT Act. Authorities are investigating the matter in detail, focusing on jail security, digital device misuse, and the potential framing of another inmate. The case has raised serious concerns about prison monitoring, inmate access to mobile devices, and the potential risks posed by high-profile cybercriminals. The Cyber Cell and Crime Branch are actively investigating, while the High Court has been kept informed and additional security measures for judges are being considered.

This episode not only adds to Mittal’s already extensive criminal record but also underscores the evolving challenges of managing high-risk offenders in the digital era, where the combination of sophisticated criminal intent and access to technology can pose significant threats even from behind bars.