Bhopal: In a significant development in the ongoing crisis over contaminated water in Indore, the Madhya Pradesh government on Thursday officially acknowledged the death of 15 individuals in Bhagirathpura as a direct result of consuming unsafe water. The announcement came as the state submitted a fresh status report to the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which has been actively monitoring the situation and demanding accountability from state authorities.

The revelation represents a notable revision from earlier statements made by government officials, who had previously indicated that at least 10 deaths were linked to water contamination in the area. The updated figure was based on an epidemiological investigation conducted by a dedicated probe committee, which traced the outbreak to December 24, 2025, suggesting that the water contamination crisis in Bhagirathpura began earlier than initially reported by state authorities. The government had earlier maintained that it only became aware of the outbreak on December 29, by which time several residents had already fallen critically ill, including a 70-year-old woman who succumbed to the illness.

The high court, which is hearing six public interest litigations (PILs) filed in response to the tragedy, has been closely scrutinizing the state’s response to the incident. During Thursday’s hearing, Chief Secretary Anurag Jain appeared before the court via video conferencing, alongside the state’s Advocate General, to provide an update on the actions taken and the relief measures extended to affected families.

According to Advocate Manish Yadav, counsel representing one of the petitioners, the state officials informed the court that, while 15 deaths were directly attributable to contaminated water, the remaining eight fatalities in the area involved individuals with significant comorbidities. This distinction, officials argued, was important in clarifying the total impact of the outbreak.

In his submission, Chief Secretary Anurag Jain stated that the interim directives issued by the high court on January 9 had been complied with and that the state had taken several measures to address both the immediate consequences of the contamination and the systemic issues that had allowed the crisis to develop. Jain emphasized that the state government, in collaboration with the Indore Municipal Corporation (IMC), had documented all actions taken in a comprehensive status report, which had been filed with the court.

The court’s involvement in the matter dates back to early January, when the Indore bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, led by Justices Vijay Kumar Shukla and Alok Awasthi, intervened following the filing of PILs highlighting the hazardous water conditions in Bhagirathpura. On January 6, the court directed the state government to submit a fresh status report, noting that the earlier report submitted on January 2 was “insensitive” and failed to accurately reflect the gravity of the situation. The bench’s criticism of the initial report centered on the perceived delay in acknowledging the outbreak and the lack of immediate action to prevent further fatalities.

The January 2 report had indicated that the state machinery only took cognizance of the problem on December 29, several days after the onset of the epidemic. By that date, a number of residents had already fallen seriously ill, and at least one death had occurred. The high court, expressing concern over the delayed response, had summoned the chief secretary to explain the reasons for the lapse and to provide assurances that effective measures were being taken to prevent similar incidents in the future.

During Thursday’s hearing, the court was informed that the state government had extended relief measures to all families affected by the crisis. Compensation has been provided to the next of kin of 21 deceased individuals, reflecting the combined total of deaths directly and indirectly associated with the outbreak. Chief Secretary Jain assured the court that these actions were carried out in strict compliance with its directives.

Additionally, the government highlighted preventive measures being undertaken under the Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT) scheme. Launched recently in Indore by the Chief Minister, the AMRUT initiative aims to address long-standing issues related to urban water supply and sewerage infrastructure. Specifically, it seeks to ensure that sewerage and drinking water pipelines are laid separately, thereby minimizing the risk of contamination and preventing a recurrence of incidents like the one in Bhagirathpura.

While the government’s report provides some clarity on the scale of the tragedy and the actions taken, petitioners’ representatives raised concerns that a detailed status report had not yet been shared with them. They emphasized the need for transparency and urged the authorities to make all relevant documentation accessible to stakeholders. Responding to these concerns, the high court directed the state government to provide copies of the full report to all petitioners and scheduled the next hearing for January 20. The court also reiterated that Chief Secretary Anurag Jain must attend the upcoming hearing to provide further clarifications.

The Bhagirathpura water contamination incident has drawn widespread attention due to both the severity of the outbreak and the delayed response by state authorities. Public health experts have pointed to a range of potential factors that could have contributed to the crisis, including aging water infrastructure, inadequate monitoring of water quality, and insufficient coordination between municipal and state-level agencies. In such urban centers, contaminated water outbreaks can have cascading effects, particularly among vulnerable populations such as the elderly and those with pre-existing medical conditions.

The high court’s intervention underscores the importance of judicial oversight in cases where public health and safety are at stake. By summoning senior state officials and demanding regular updates, the court has sought to hold the government accountable for lapses in both prevention and response. Legal observers note that the court’s insistence on detailed reporting and compensation demonstrates a proactive approach to ensuring that victims and their families receive redress and that systemic reforms are implemented to prevent similar tragedies.

In response to the court’s directives, state authorities have reportedly intensified water testing in affected areas and initiated remedial measures, including disinfection of water lines and provision of safe drinking water through alternative supply channels. Officials have also undertaken awareness campaigns to educate residents about the risks of consuming potentially contaminated water and to encourage timely reporting of symptoms indicative of waterborne illnesses.

The Indore water crisis also highlights broader challenges faced by rapidly growing urban centers in India, where population pressures and infrastructure deficits often combine to create public health vulnerabilities. Experts stress that proactive investment in water treatment facilities, pipeline maintenance, and real-time monitoring systems is essential to preventing similar incidents in the future.

As the legal proceedings continue, all eyes are on the Madhya Pradesh government to ensure that it not only addresses the immediate consequences of the Bhagirathpura outbreak but also implements long-term measures to secure safe drinking water for Indore’s residents. The high court’s January 20 hearing is expected to provide further clarity on the state’s compliance with its directives and the steps being taken to enhance accountability and transparency in the management of urban water systems.

For the families affected by the tragedy, the government’s acknowledgment of 15 deaths represents a critical step toward recognition of their suffering. However, questions remain regarding the adequacy of relief measures, the thoroughness of the epidemiological investigation, and the broader reforms needed to prevent recurrence. Public health advocates argue that this incident should serve as a wake-up call for authorities to prioritize water safety, infrastructure upgrades, and rapid response mechanisms in urban centers across India.

In conclusion, the Bhagirathpura water contamination incident has exposed significant gaps in the management of urban water supply in Indore and has highlighted the vital role of judicial oversight in protecting public health. While the state government has taken steps to compensate victims and initiate preventive measures, the high court’s continued scrutiny ensures that accountability remains at the forefront. As authorities work to implement infrastructure improvements and safety protocols under the AMRUT scheme, the focus will be on safeguarding the health of residents and preventing any recurrence of such a devastating public health crisis.

---