New Delhi: Months after the passing of industrialist Sunjay Kapur, the legal wrangling over his vast estate has intensified, with his third wife, Priya Kapur, reportedly approaching the Supreme Court to access documents related to his earlier divorce from Bollywood actress Karisma Kapoor. The move highlights the continuing complexity surrounding one of India’s most high-profile inheritance disputes, which now involves questions of financial settlements, child custody, and the authenticity of contested legal documents.

According to reports from ANI, Priya Kapur has petitioned the apex court seeking certified copies of all records connected to the 2016 divorce proceedings between Karisma Kapoor and Sunjay Kapur. The petition reportedly seeks detailed information on the financial settlements and custody arrangements that were finalized at the time, suggesting that Priya Kapur intends to use these records to clarify her late husband’s obligations and rights during the earlier divorce.

The Supreme Court petition, filed under confidential terms, comes as part of a broader legal strategy by Priya Kapur amid the ongoing dispute over Sunjay Kapur’s estate, which is estimated to be worth around ₹30,000 crore. A bench led by Justice AS Chandurkar is expected to examine whether the confidential documents can be lawfully shared with her, weighing issues of privacy, inheritance rights, and the public interest in ensuring transparent legal proceedings.

Background of the Estate Dispute

Sunjay Kapur, a prominent industrialist with substantial business holdings, passed away in late 2025, leaving behind a sprawling estate that has since become the subject of intense legal scrutiny. His third wife, Priya Kapur, and his children from his previous marriage to Karisma Kapoor, Samaira and Kiaan Kapur, have emerged as central figures in a battle that is playing out both in courtrooms and in the public eye.

The dispute over Sunjay Kapur’s will gained attention after Priya Kapur filed legal challenges concerning the execution of the estate documents, claiming that she was entitled to a larger share or specific assets. Meanwhile, Samaira and Kiaan Kapur have questioned the legitimacy of these claims, citing alleged inconsistencies in the digital records associated with the will and asserting that Priya Kapur may have misrepresented her presence during its execution.

Children Question ‘Digital Trail’

As reported earlier by Hindustan Times, the children of Sunjay Kapur and Karisma Kapoor have raised objections to alleged electronic records connected to the execution of their father’s contested will. Sources familiar with the matter said that the siblings flagged several discrepancies in what they describe as the “digital trail” presented before the Delhi High Court by Priya Kapur.

One key piece of evidence involves Priya Kapur’s mobile phone location data, which reportedly places her in New Delhi on March 21, 2025. This is significant because Priya Kapur stated in an affidavit that she was physically present in Gurugram on the same day when Sunjay Kapur’s contested will was executed. The discrepancy, if authenticated, could carry substantial implications for the validity of the affidavit and the subsequent legal claims arising from the will.

Legal experts caution that courts often take electronic evidence seriously, particularly when it appears to contradict sworn statements. Advocate Swapnil Kothari explained, “When an affidavit clashes with electronic evidence, courts become extremely cautious. Even a single inconsistency can prompt a re-examination of the larger narrative and could impact the outcome of the dispute.”

Questions Over the Will’s Authenticity

The estate battle has also brought scrutiny to the will itself. Court filings submitted earlier by the children reportedly raised concerns about spelling errors, inconsistent pronoun usage, and internal contradictions in the document. These alleged irregularities have added layers of complexity to an already contentious case, prompting legal observers to note that any further discrepancies in supporting records could intensify the court’s review and possibly affect the distribution of Sunjay Kapur’s estate.

In parallel, Samaira and Kiaan Kapur are reportedly seeking criminal action against Priya Kapur. According to NDTV, the siblings have urged the court to invoke Sections 338 and 340 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Samhita, alleging that a fabricated will may have been created to exclude them from their inheritance. Their submissions claim that neither Sunjay Kapur nor Priya Kapur were present in Gurugram on the critical date, March 21, 2025, but were instead in New Delhi. They further assert that Karisma Kapoor was in contact with Sunjay Kapur via WhatsApp on that day regarding matters such as Portuguese citizenship for the children, reinforcing their argument that Priya Kapur’s affidavit may be inaccurate.

Potential Implications for Estate Distribution

The legal developments have significant implications for the distribution of Sunjay Kapur’s estate. If Priya Kapur is granted access to the Karisma–Sunjay divorce records, it could provide insights into any ongoing financial obligations or settlements that might affect her claims on the estate. This includes the possibility of understanding whether previous settlements or custodial arrangements could influence her legal entitlements or shape the court’s interpretation of the estate’s division.

Conversely, if the inconsistencies highlighted by Samaira and Kiaan Kapur are substantiated, Priya Kapur’s credibility in court may be affected, potentially altering the outcome of her claims. Courts typically weigh electronic evidence, affidavits, and witness testimony collectively when assessing the validity of contested wills and inheritance claims, meaning that even minor discrepancies can trigger closer judicial scrutiny.

Wider Legal Context

The dispute also underscores broader legal issues related to inheritance and estate management in India, particularly in high-value cases involving multiple marriages and blended families. Cases like these often involve complex intersections of civil law, family law, and probate law, with courts required to balance the rights of spouses, children, and other beneficiaries. In addition, the rising use of digital records and mobile data in legal disputes is transforming how courts assess evidence and verify statements, making accuracy and consistency in electronic documentation increasingly critical.

Legal analysts note that Priya Kapur’s Supreme Court petition is significant not only because it seeks access to sensitive divorce records but also because it tests the boundaries of privacy and transparency in inheritance disputes. Access to such records is generally restricted due to confidentiality concerns, particularly when they involve high-profile individuals. The Supreme Court’s decision on whether to allow Priya Kapur access could establish a precedent for how courts manage privacy versus disclosure in estate litigation.

Next Steps

The Supreme Court is expected to examine Priya Kapur’s petition in the coming weeks. The bench of Justice AS Chandurkar will need to decide whether granting access to the Karisma–Sunjay Kapur divorce records is warranted, taking into account privacy concerns, the relevance of the documents to the ongoing estate dispute, and potential impacts on the parties involved. Meanwhile, the Delhi High Court may continue to scrutinize the authenticity of digital records and the contested will, with the siblings seeking to challenge any discrepancies and ensure the accurate execution of Sunjay Kapur’s estate.

For Priya Kapur, gaining access to the divorce records could provide essential context regarding her late husband’s prior financial arrangements and custody commitments, potentially informing her claims on the estate. For Samaira and Kiaan Kapur, the emphasis will likely remain on validating the digital evidence and ensuring that any contested documents are critically assessed by the courts.

Conclusion

The legal battle over Sunjay Kapur’s estate illustrates the complex dynamics that can arise in high-value inheritance disputes involving multiple marriages, high-profile individuals, and intricate estate planning. Priya Kapur’s move to the Supreme Court to access divorce records highlights the continuing struggle for clarity and accountability in managing such vast estates. At the same time, the challenges raised by Sunjay Kapur’s children regarding digital inconsistencies and alleged fabrications underscore the increasing importance of electronic evidence in modern litigation.

As the courts prepare to hear arguments on access to confidential divorce documents and the authenticity of contested wills, the dispute over the Kapur estate is likely to remain closely watched by legal experts, media, and the public alike. The outcome will not only affect the distribution of one of India’s largest private estates but may also set important precedents for handling inheritance disputes, electronic evidence, and privacy in high-profile cases.

---