Trump Administration Challenges California’s New Congressional Map

Washington, D.C. – The Trump administration has joined a federal lawsuit against California, contesting the state’s recently approved redistricting plan under Proposition 50, passed by voters on November 4 with roughly 64% support.

The Department of Justice announced Thursday that it would seek to overturn the new congressional district map, arguing that the changes unlawfully favor Hispanic communities and dilute Republican voters’ influence, effectively constituting racial gerrymandering.

“California’s redistricting scheme is a brazen power grab that tramples on civil rights and mocks the democratic process,” said Attorney General Pam Bondi. “Governor Newsom’s attempt to entrench one-party rule and silence millions of Californians will not stand.”

---

Proposition 50 and Its Political Implications

Proposition 50 transfers congressional redistricting authority from the independent commission to the state legislature for the next three elections (2026, 2028, 2030). Critics argue the move aims to boost Democratic representation, potentially giving Democrats up to five additional seats in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2026.

The ballot initiative was seen by many as a response to Republican-led gerrymandering in other states, such as:

• Texas – Republicans redrew maps to potentially gain five seats.
• Missouri and North Carolina – Republicans could gain one seat each.
• Ohio – Republicans could gain up to two seats.

Civil rights advocates have raised concerns that these maps disadvantage minority communities in some Republican states, mirroring complaints now leveled against California’s Proposition 50.

---

Legal Challenges and Political Responses

The lawsuit was filed by the California Republican Party and 19 registered voters on November 5, one day after the election. They claim the map violates the U.S. Constitution by favoring specific racial groups and undermining the principle of equal representation.

The Justice Department’s complaint echoes these concerns, stating that the California map “manipulates district lines in the name of bolstering the voting power of Hispanic Californians because of their race.”

In response, Governor Gavin Newsom’s office dismissed the lawsuit:

“These losers lost at the ballot box and soon they will also lose in court,” said spokesperson Brandon Richards.

Newsom, a prominent Democratic critic of former President Trump, called his opposition to Proposition 50 “the ramblings of an old man that knows he’s about to LOSE”. Newsom has also confirmed he may consider a White House run in 2028, once the 2026 midterm elections conclude.

---

How Proposition 50 Alters Electoral Maps

Normally, California’s congressional districts are drawn by an independent commission, based on the decennial U.S. Census. Proposition 50 suspends that process and allows the state legislature to adopt maps, which critics argue are explicitly partisan in nature.

For example, one new district unites rural conservative areas of northern California with liberal Marin County, across the Golden Gate Bridge from San Francisco, effectively diluting Republican voter power in a strategic move.

The DOJ is asking a federal judge to block California from using the new map in any upcoming elections, potentially creating a prolonged legal battle ahead of the 2026 midterms.

---

The Broader Context of U.S. Redistricting

Redistricting, often called gerrymandering, occurs when parties in power redraw electoral boundaries to favor their own candidates. Across the United States, this practice has become a contentious issue, with both Republican and Democratic states accused of manipulating maps.

Proposition 50 represents a high-profile example of partisan redistricting, setting the stage for potential legal precedents on race, representation, and electoral fairness.