Mumbai: Filmmaker and actor Anurag Kashyap has long been vocal about the challenges filmmakers face with censorship in India. Known for pushing boundaries and exploring gritty, realistic narratives, Kashyap has often criticised the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) for its conservative approach toward content. However, in a recent candid conversation with Komal Nahta on his podcast, Kashyap revealed that his perspective on censorship has shifted, following a surprising and constructive experience with the board regarding his own film.

A Shift in Perspective

Kashyap explained that his previous views on the censor board were shaped by observing strict interventions and alterations demanded in films that dealt with violence, profanity, or sensitive themes. But when he approached the board for his latest film, he found the members’ approach both professional and, unexpectedly, lighthearted.

He shared:

“Mere vichaar kaafi censorship ke baare me badle hein. Jab mein khud ki film censor karane gaya… Khud ki film censor karane se pehle maine dusri film ke baare mein ek post daala tha. Maine dekha dikkat nahi he, aur bohot pyaar se censor board ne bhi bola. Pehle toh shock ho gaye. Bole, ’Sir, Anurag Kashyap ki film aur khoon kharaba nahi he? gaali-galouch nahi he? wo hasne lage, Bole sir aap kyu compromise capitalise ke liye ladte rehte ho?”

In English, Kashyap clarified that the board members were initially shocked that his film contained no murder, bloodshed, or abusive language. They laughed and asked him why he often raised concerns about compromise and censorship in his films, given that his current work had none of the content that typically triggers objections.

A Candid Conversation

Kashyap further elaborated on the discussion with the board, recounting how they patiently explained the constraints under which they operate.

“Unhone bade pyaar se bola ki hum log yaha baithe he, humey jo rules diye gaye hein, jo guidelines diye gaye hein woh follow kar rahe hein. Woh daayra agar aapko badalna he, toh pehle aap log toh ekhaatte ho? You come together first. You put a front together and get the rule changed for us.”

According to him, the board members were keen to convey that their work is governed strictly by the rules and guidelines provided, and they cannot arbitrarily change them. If filmmakers or other stakeholders wish to modify the system, they need to unite and formally propose changes.

This exchange apparently surprised Kashyap, who noted that the experience challenged his assumptions about the censor board’s rigidity. He emphasised that the members were professional, cooperative, and open to dialogue, highlighting that the issue often lies not with individual members but with the limitations of the existing guidelines.

Context of His Latest Film

Although Kashyap did not specifically name the film he discussed, his most recent directorial release is Nishaanchi, a crime drama featuring Aaishvary Thackeray, Vedika Pinto, and Monika Panwar, which released on 19 September 2025. Unlike many of his previous films that depicted intense violence or explored dark themes, Nishaanchi appears to have a narrative that avoided excessive gore or vulgarity, which may have contributed to the censor board’s reaction.

By sharing this experience, Kashyap seems to be pointing out a nuanced understanding of censorship: while rules may seem restrictive, there is room for communication, understanding, and mutual respect when filmmakers engage constructively with the board.

Censorship in India: A Longstanding Debate

India’s censor system has long been a point of contention in the film industry. Directors, writers, and actors frequently clash with the CBFC over content deemed violent, sexual, or politically sensitive, leading to cuts, disclaimers, or even bans. Kashyap himself has previously expressed frustration over having to compromise on his creative vision, arguing that films should reflect reality, no matter how uncomfortable.

Films like Gangs of Wasseypur, Ugly, and Paanch have faced CBFC scrutiny, often for their depiction of crime, profanity, or social taboos. In the past, Kashyap has criticised the board for being overly cautious, citing examples where even minimal, contextually relevant content was flagged for cuts.

However, this recent experience with Nishaanchi appears to have tempered his view, showing him that board members are not adversaries by default but are bound by procedural rules. His story underscores the potential for constructive dialogue between filmmakers and the censor board, which could lead to smoother certification processes and mutual understanding.

The Importance of Industry Dialogue

Kashyap’s comments also highlight a broader message: for meaningful reform in censorship, the industry must unite and proactively engage with the system. The board members’ words, as he recounted, emphasised that change cannot occur from individual complaints alone but requires coordinated action and dialogue.

This approach, Kashyap suggests, could lead to a more transparent, predictable, and fairer system that balances creative freedom with societal sensitivities. It also serves as a reminder that the censor board’s role is to implement existing rules, not to act as moral arbiters of content.

A Shift Toward Understanding

Kashyap concluded that his personal experience has softened his stance, prompting him to reconsider his previous criticisms. He realised that many assumptions about censorship are based on anecdotes or past experiences with films that did not adhere to CBFC norms. By engaging directly and respectfully, he found that board members were approachable, professional, and willing to discuss concerns openly.

In essence, Kashyap’s story is a call for mutual respect, dialogue, and collaboration between filmmakers and regulatory bodies. It is a reminder that censorship is not inherently adversarial, and constructive communication can lead to better outcomes for both creators and regulators.

Looking Ahead

With Nishaanchi as the backdrop for this revelation, Kashyap’s reflections may encourage other filmmakers to approach censorship with greater openness and understanding. While debates around creative freedom and societal norms are unlikely to end soon, experiences like Kashyap’s suggest that censorship need not always be a battleground, and meaningful conversations can pave the way for a more nuanced approach.

By sharing his personal interaction, Kashyap not only sheds light on the working of the censor board but also encourages the film community to engage constructively rather than assume opposition. His candid reflections provide a fresh perspective on an often polarising topic, offering both insight and hope for filmmakers navigating India’s certification system.

---